Lately my mailbox is full of invitations. With a little bit of effort, they promise, I can hang out with the cool crowd.
Having just entered yet another competitive art exhibit I will
admit that I have really mixed feelings about these things. Let me wade through my thoughts and perhaps come
to a conclusion…
Most experienced artists, consultants, teachers and coaches
encourage artists to enter juried (competitive) exhibits. It’s a resume
builder. If you can list on your CV acceptance into several competitive exhibits
then your stock as an artist goes up. And
if you can claim an award at these
prestigious exhibits, well then, aren’t you something!
I’ve done my share of competitive exhibits. I have been
honored with awards, and been denied entry into exhibits - even with the same painting.
Each time I sign my name on an exhibit prospectus I wonder
if I’m not undermining something precious.
We as creative people reach deeply into our hearts and
psyches to solve problems or to search for answers. We use words like
resonance, memory, and perception. A mark is made, then a pause for a response. We create our own vocabulary and hope the
nuances and subtleties come through in a language that can be shared. We are alone in a timeless place with no
thoughts of how our creative energies measure up. Until the mail comes.
How does one grade
something like that? How does one judge
the validity of what comes from that place?
Okay, you say. A good jurist will evaluate technique, that
is, whether or not the artist knows how to manipulate their medium of choice.
That statement alone takes the creative act and dumps it
squarely into the realm of…what? Cake decorating? Gymnastics? Does the artist get 10 points for adequate brushwork
and docked 2 points if the canvas shows through? Add to that the fact that in a multi-media
show, the judge may not be familiar with all types of processes. Can a
watercolorist accurately judge ceramics?
Then there is the final caveat: It is
just one person’s opinion. Virtually
every jurist starts out their remarks saying just that. In fact, I just
spent time surfing through several “how to” blogs on judging art shows.
Regardless of what tricks and tips are shared, they all wrap it up the same
way: bottom line, it is just one
person’s opinion. That statement is the balm of those who go unnoticed and the
admission of the judge who knows there are no right answers to be had.
And yet we artists keep sending in slides and applications,
tossing in $30 or $40 bucks per piece, begging to be approved by that one
person who, admittedly, is an idiot if
they don’t choose us.
I’ve been on both sides; I’ve been the judge awarding the
ribbons and I’ve been the participant. It’s a joyful, painful experience either
way.
So why do it?
I’m not sure there’s an answer. We humans have a need to
know our place in the crowd, to know that we’re better than X, or not quite as
good as Z.
There’s an underside to the lofty art world for sure. Being juried into and out of exhibits surely takes the blush
off the rose. If you can stick with it you grow some thicker
skin and learn about yourself. You test your mettle, so to speak. Maybe that’s
reason enough.
Chapter 2 comes next week. Does the emperor wear a paint
smock? I've been pondering this subject for awhile and there are several facets to consider. Chime in please.
Let’s open a
conversation about this. Whaddya think? No, really, I'm interested.